This is the third one of the Dilemma Series. To read the previous two click on the links : ( Unwilling Emailer , Who is fit to be a CEO)
______________________________________________________________
Andy was the CEO of a multinational company named Brag-on Solutions which made software products for the Hospitality Domain. Brag-on made an entry into the Indian market in 2007 and opened their first Software Development Centre in Calcutta. In 2008, Anita was hired as the Director of the Indian operations and they grew in numbers from 20 to 250 people in the last four years. Anita reported to Andy who was overall in-charge of the Calcutta facility.
Anita was a very efficient, goal oriented and focused Manager who had single handedly developed and nurtured the India facility. Due the India office, Brag-on was able to sustain its profitability and keeping the overall operating expense down even in the period of economic slowdown. The US office was very pleased with the performance of its Indian arm and while they had restricted any new hiring in the other facilities in the rest of the offices around the world, Anita was given complete freedom in increasing the headcount.
Everything was fine, but Andy was worried over the turnover rate of the employees in India. The attrition rate had increased from 18% to 29% the last one year. In his last visit, Andy has sensed some sort of restlessness in the employees and the employee survey indicated that the people were not happy with the leadership style of the management - aka - Anita.
So, this year, Andy had asked the HR manager to fix up a skip level meeting with the senior employees of the Calcutta office. he had asked Siddhu, the HR Manager to put together a diverse group of people some senior , a few new entrants, employees who have been with the organization for 5+ years and some new joiners , people from different functions. But , Andy knew that people in India just did not open up. It was difficult to get feedback from them.....
The skip level meeting started .
Andy : Folks , it is good to see all of you. I want to assure you that whatever feedback or comments you give will be confidential. And as you know that we promote an open culture. Any feedback you give will help the company improve. So , please go ahead.
Silence ...
Shammi ( a junior developer ) : We are happy with our work. We are getting enough opportunities to grow. I love this place. There is a bit of stretch, but it is OK.
Silence again ....
Andy : Guys , I need more conversation...
Lavanya : ( a senior person who has been with the organization from the last 5 years ) : Andy, We are happy with the work, I agree we get enough opportunities. We are learning and growing , but...
Andy : Go on ...
Lavanya : Well , I think there is a problem of empowerment. All the decisions are finally taken by Anita. Also , I feel that she is too technical and instead of leaving the tactical and operational decisions with the managers, she is involved in everything - which makes us feel puny. Another problem that we face is that we do not feel appreciated. Whenever there is a small lapse , it is written in the appraisal form but the good work we do is not mentioned...
Andy : Go on please...
Lavanya : And you talked about open culture. I don't know how true is that here... I am sure I will be punished for speaking out here ... but I feel it is my duty here.
Andy had given feedback to Anita about her style and had asked her to "nurture" her employees.
As suspected by Lavanya, the feedback from the skip level leaked and she was given a low rating in the appraisal and did not get any increment.
Lavanya knew this was coming, so she had started looking out for a job and resigned. But she wrote an email to Andy after she put in her papers telling him "See... this is what I had known would happen".
Andy knew that Anita was good at her job and was getting the results... the only drawback was the attrition and the employee morale.
What should Andy do to improve the situation in the India office ?
